Artists and writers are in a panic — they have discovered that their works are being used to train generative AI. A surge of loud discussions arises in the media when it turns out that generative AI, such as ChatGPT and others, have been using materials from artists, photographers, writers, and journalists without their permission. Now, with generative AI competing with them and taking their bread, everyone is suddenly up in arms.
Allow me to offer my perspective on this. The uproar about somehow restricting the use of materials for AI training seems laughable and evokes nothing but a sardonic smirk from me. Just as no one could stop the spread of pirated software through Fidonet, BBS, and IRC chats 30 years ago, and later through internet forums, eDonkey, a now through Torrents, and the Darknet, no one will be able to control what materials AI developers use to train their models. It is foolish to think that someone will develop “bulletproof” algorithms to modify graphical and other materials to confuse AI during model training. AI developers will devise countermeasures to bypass these, without a doubt.
It’s equally naive to think that some legislation will genuinely hinder the use of certain materials in training sets. This will not happen. Instead, developers will take additional technical and algorithmic measures to keep using available materials indirectly, and also ensure that querying their … >>> Read the rest